Ireland is at a crossroads, with the Justice Minister, Jim O’Callaghan, proposing new domestic laws to compel encrypted messaging services to provide law enforcement with access. While ostensibly aimed at combating serious crimes, this move represents a fundamental misunderstanding of how modern digital security works. The notion that we can create a “backdoor” for the “good guys” without simultaneously creating a vulnerability for everyone is not just a policy flaw—it’s a dangerous fantasy.
The proposed legislation, the Communications (Interception and Lawful Access) Bill, seeks to replace the outdated 1993 act. It’s a response to lobbying from An Garda Síochána (the Irish police) and the Defence Forces, who argue that encrypted platforms like WhatsApp and iMessage have become the “Wild West” for organized crime and other threats. While the intent to protect public safety is laudable, the method is deeply flawed.
The truth is, encryption is a security feature, not a bug. End-to-end encryption ensures that a message is only readable by the sender and the intended recipient. There is no middleman, not even the platform itself, who can read the content. This is the same technology that secures online banking, protects corporate secrets, and safeguards the communications of journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens. A backdoor, once created, is a master key. It will not only be used by law enforcement but will inevitably be found and exploited by malicious actors, including cybercriminals and hostile foreign governments. This would make everyone—from a child online to a financial institution—more vulnerable.
The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) has rightly pointed out this critical flaw, a position echoed by major tech companies like Apple and WhatsApp, who have previously stated they would rather withdraw services than compromise their users’ security. This is not a stance of defiance but one of technical reality. It is impossible to build a “magic” backdoor that only works for a specific government.
This debate goes beyond Ireland’s borders. It is a microcosm of a global struggle between law enforcement’s desire for access and the fundamental human right to privacy and security in the digital age. We’ve seen this play out in the UK and other nations, where governments have faced strong opposition from civil society and the tech community.
A Call to Attention: The Fight for Digital Security is Everyone’s Fight
The Irish government’s proposal is not just an Irish issue—it’s a global threat to digital security. If Ireland, a key hub for many of these tech companies, succeeds in passing such a law, it sets a dangerous precedent for other nations to follow. This could trigger a cascade of “lawful access” laws that would systematically erode the security of the global internet.
The stakes are too high to remain silent. We must support the efforts of organizations like the ICCL in their advocacy. The summer recess provides a window of opportunity to make our voices heard before the draft legislation is formally presented. We must make it clear to the Irish government and all policymakers that the idea of a safe backdoor is a fantasy.
We must amplify these concerns on every available channel. As experts in the field, our collective voice is powerful. A joint statement or letter from the global community of civil society and tech experts would be an invaluable tool to get media attention and influence the legislative process. Let’s work together to ensure that the future of the internet is built on a foundation of strong, unbreakable encryption for all.




More Stories
ICANN84 Kicks Off in Dublin, Focusing on Next-Gen Internet Governance.
ICANN84 Meeting in Dublin Fast Approaching: Key Dates and Registration Deadlines.
AfPIF 2025: Industry Leaders Chart New Course for Nigeria’s Content Delivery.